Split-Second Decisions Under Fire
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Désolé, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'ajouter l'article car votre panier est déjà plein.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
Listen in!
Takeaways:
- Use-of-force decisions are judged without the benefit of hindsight—by law.
- Deadly threats don’t always look like guns or knives.
- Rocks can constitute lethal force depending on context and intent.
- Once a threat is perceived, the body doesn’t instantly de-escalate.
- Officers must decide in seconds what others analyze for months.
- Fitness and confidence directly affect escalation decisions.
- Out-of-shape officers are more likely to rely on lethal force.
- Tasers and less-lethal tools are not guaranteed solutions.
- Fear of public backlash changes officer behavior in dangerous ways.
- Social media incentivizes outrage, not understanding.
- Many situations escalate because force wasn’t applied early enough.
- Body cameras protect truth—but also fuel Monday-morning quarterbacking.
- Legal justification does not equal moral comfort.
- Modern policing creates hesitation that can cost lives.
- Training gaps leave officers unprepared for real-world chaos.
- Officer survival and public safety must remain the priority.
Thank you for listening to this episoce of FIT Responder!
Thank you for listening to Fit Responder. If you would like to see if it's a fit to work with us in any capacity, please visit FitResponder.com as well follow us on Instagram at @fitresponder
Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?
Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.Bonne écoute !
Aucun commentaire pour le moment