Send us a text

In this episode of Off Air, I break down why Bill and Hillary Clinton defied a lawful congressional subpoena, and why that decision may have sealed their legal fate.

This isn’t speculation. Refusing to appear before Congress is contempt — and history shows exactly what happens next.

I walk through how Chairman James Comer issued subpoenas, why the Clintons stalled for months, and how their final refusal wasn’t just political theater — it was a legal admission.

We also connect the dots the media won’t touch:

• The Clinton Foundation
• Jeffrey Epstein’s financial role
• The private email server
• Benghazi
• Ghislaine Maxwell’s testimony
• Prior DOJ decisions that suddenly make sense in hindsight

This episode lays out how contempt of Congress works, why executive privilege won’t save them, and why past cases prove prison time is not off the table.

If you want to understand what’s really behind the subpoena, and why the Clintons are fighting so hard to avoid sworn testimony, this episode is essential listening.

Tune in.

Additional Resources:

📖 Read Ron’s book Truth and Persuasion in a Digital Revolution
https://a.co/d/2GxCpsZ

✍️ Subscribe to Ron’s Substack for deeper investigations
https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/

💡 Free sample of Truth and Persuasion
https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/p/truth-and-persuasion-free-sample?r=5ojo21&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true

📲 Follow Ron on social
Twitter: @RonChapmanAtty
Instagram: @ronchapman

👍 If this breakdown helped you understand what’s really happening behind the scenes, like the video, share it, and subscribe for real legal commentary grounded in experience.

🔔 Hit the bell so you never miss an Off Air episode.

Send us a text

You work hard, pay taxes, and play by the rules, so why is your money funding fake daycare centers and maybe even terrorism?

In this episode, I’m scrutinizing one of the biggest fraud scandals in America, happening right under our noses in Minnesota.

Billions of your tax dollars are vanishing into programs that were supposed to help people, and instead, they’re being exploited by politically connected fraudsters.

I’ll dig into the numbers, the cases, and the names, including Representative Ilhan Omar and Governor Tim Walz.

I spent hundreds of hours combing through filings and reports, and what I found will make your jaw drop. Funding might be making its way into the hands of terrorist-linked groups.

This is the episode you can’t afford to miss.

Key Takeaways

Introduction (00:00)

Feeding Our Future and MDE audit failures (03:36)

Housing Stabilization Services fraud details (08:48)

Fraud tourism and inflated billing (10:09)

Viral video narrative examined (14:25)

Ilhan Omar censure attempt and vote fallout (18:11)

Tim Walz's framing of fraud scrutiny as racism (24:34)

Additional Resources

📖 Read Ron’s book Truth and Persuasion in a Digital Revolution

https://a.co/d/2GxCpsZ

✍️ Subscribe to Ron’s Substack for deeper investigations: https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/

💡 Free sample of Truth and Persuasion here:https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/p/truth-and-persuasion-free-sample?r=5ojo21&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true

📲 Follow Ron on social:

Twitter:@RonChapmanAtty

Instagram: @ronchapman

👍 If you found this breakdown insightful, like the video, share it, and subscribe for real legal commentary grounded in experience.

🔔 Hit the bell so you never miss an ‘Off Air’ episode.

Send us a text

If a foreign enemy killed 80,000 Americans, we’d call it war. But when those deaths come from overdose? We call it crime.

In this episode, I will lay out the shocking reality of how state-sponsored drug networks are waging war on the U.S and Venezuela is at the heart of it.

I will explain how the U.S. is legally reframing these cartels as terrorist threats and what that means for our national defense.

You’ll walk away with a new understanding of how international law, U.S. drug policy, and military strategy intersect.

Listen to the full episode now and find out the legal justification for targeting Venezuela.

Key Takeaways

Introduction (00:00)

Legal and strategic justifications for targeting Venezuela (01:35)

International law and the concept of armed attack (04:47)

Role of Congress and legal authorization (13:34)

The moral and strategic case for targeting Venezuela (16:40)

The impact of US actions on global drug trafficking (18:46)

Future of US-Venezuela relations and military interventions (24:37)

Additional Resources

📖 Read Ron’s book Truth and Persuasion in a Digital Revolution

https://a.co/d/2GxCpsZ

✍️ Subscribe to Ron’s Substack for deeper investigations: https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/

💡 Free sample of Truth and Persuasion here:https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/p/truth-and-persuasion-free-sample?r=5ojo21&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true

📲 Follow Ron on social:

Twitter:@RonChapmanAtty

Instagram: @ronchapman

👍 If you found this breakdown insightful, share it, and subscribe for real legal commentary grounded in experience.

Send us a text

They instigated the January 6 events and lied about it. This isn’t some tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory. This is a documented fact.

In this episode of ‘Off Air’, I lay out the truth the media doesn’t want you to hear.

The FBI had 26 confidential informants in the crowd at the Capitol on January 6. That’s from the Justice Department’s Inspector General report.

Some of those informants even crossed restricted lines. One entered the Capitol Building. But the FBI wants us to believe they were just passive observers.

I will also break down one of the most egregious acts of media manipulation I’ve ever seen. The BBC maliciously edited Trump’s January 6 speech to make it sound like he incited violence.

This episode exposes all the liars in the media, in government, in the courtroom, who twisted this event into a political weapon to interfere with the elections.

Tune in!

Key Takeaways

Introduction (00:00)

FBI had 26 confidential informants in the Capitol crowd (02:03)

At least one informant entered the building (04:29)

Informants engaged in illegal activities (05:12)

Capitol security was intentionally under-prepared (09:48)

Kamala Harris compares Jan. 6 to 9/11 and Pearl Harbor (15:03)

Trump’s actual call for peaceful protest (22:07)

Trump’s real-time tweets promoting peace (24:23)

BBC doctored Trump’s speech with deceptive edits (28:14)

BBC misrepresented the video timeline of protesters (31:27)

Lack of media accountability and peer condemnation (35:43)

Additional Resources

📖 Read Ron’s book Truth and Persuasion in a Digital Revolution

https://a.co/d/2GxCpsZ

✍️ Subscribe to Ron’s Substack for deeper investigations: https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/

💡 Free sample of Truth and Persuasion here:https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/p/truth-and-persuasion-free-sample?r=5ojo21&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true

📲 Follow Ron on social:

Twitter:@RonChapmanAtty

Instagram: @ronchapman

👍 If you found this breakdown insightful, share it, and subscribe for real legal commentary grounded in experience.

Send us a text

Ron’s New Book: https://open.substack.com/pub/ronaldwchapman/p/truth-and-persuasion-free-sample?r=5ojo21&utm_medium=ios

For a Deeper Dive: https://open.substack.com/pub/ronaldwchapman/p/letitia-jamess-pattern-problem?r=5ojo21&utm_medium=ios

Episode Description

NY just delivered Pam Bondi a 333 page handbook to a civil rights case against Letitia James. Join Federal Trial Lawyer Ron Chapman to go inside the ruling and understand why this case was corrupt from the outset. Learn what’s in store for James and her staff and the DOJ investigation.

Send us a text

In United States v. Campbell, Ron Chapman argues before the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals against the "deliberate ignorance" jury instruction used in the case of Dr. Campbell, a Louisville physician acquitted of improper prescriptions. The government's attempt to claim willful blindness raises important issues regarding justice and medical practice regulations.

Send us a text

Donald Trump is now a convicted felon, Hunter Biden is now a convicted felon. If we think this wasn't political, think again. This begs the question, how far is too far when vague statutes are used to wage political warfare with jail as a consequence? Ron takes you into executive expansion, agency power, vagueness in criminal statutes and the several cases up this term before the Supreme court that will determine if the Supreme Court has elected to protect our constitution or destroy it.

Quote: "As this term progresses and you start to see the Supreme Court strike down the overly broad interpretation of Sarbanes Oxly 800 January 6th defendants will have their convictions impacted..."

Check out Ron's Book Discussing Executive Overreach: https://ronaldwchapman.com/book

Contact Ron Here: httys://ronaldwchapman.com

Send us a text

BONUS EPISODE United States v. Trump oral argument.

Website: https://ronaldwchapman.com
Book: https://ronaldwchapman.com/book

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. Trump. In this bonus episode I recap some of the oral argument as well as a prediction for the outcome of the case.

In August 2023, Donald Trump was indicted for allegations that he conspired to overturn the 2020 election. He filed a motion to dismiss the indictment arguing presidential immunity for his official acts.

The D.C. Circuit disagreed causing Trump to file in the Supreme Court.

On April 26, 2024 the Supreme Court heard oral argument in what justice Gorsuch would call "a decision for the ages".