Miranda v. Arizona: The Case That Changed How Police Question Suspects
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Désolé, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'ajouter l'article car votre panier est déjà plein.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
Miranda v. Arizona: The Case That Changed How Police Question Suspects
-
Lu par :
-
De :
In 1966, the Supreme Court decided that the Constitution requires police to inform suspects of their rights before questioning them. Ernesto Miranda had confessed to kidnapping and rape after two hours of interrogation, without ever being told he could remain silent or have a lawyer present. This episode traces the case from a Phoenix police station to the highest court in the land, and the legal battle that gave us the Miranda warning.
Trial Tapes breaks down real court opinions into dramatic, accessible stories. New episodes every week.
Search "Trial Tapes" on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Aucun commentaire pour le moment