Inerrancy from a Wesleyan Perspective (Part 3) w/ Dr. Murray Vasser
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Désolé, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'ajouter l'article car votre panier est déjà plein.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
Clay talks with Dr. Murray Vasser about the doctrine of inerrancy from a Wesleyan perspective. This is the third part of a three-episode series.
Resources Mentioned:
- Should Wesleyans embrace biblical inerrancy? by Murray Vasser
- Was John Wesley an inerrantist? by Murray Vasser
- A Response to David Watson on Biblical Inerrancy (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4) by Murray Vasser
- A Response to Michael Licona on Biblical Inerrancy by Murray Vasser
- Why Are There Differences in the Gospels?: What We Can Learn from Ancient Biography by Michael Licona
- Christobiography: Memory, History, and the Reliability of the Gospels by Craig Keener
- Wesley, Wesleyans, and Reading Bible as Scripture edited by David F. Watson and Joel B. Green
- Wesleyans and Inerrancy with Matt Ayars, Steve Blakemore, and Murray Vasser (More to the Story podcast with Andy Miller III)
- The Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics with Exposition
Aucun commentaire pour le moment