SHOW NOTES

Is Claude Code Anthropic's "ChatGPT moment"? The question has been everywhere this month — Bloomberg, Fortune, Axios, developer Twitter. Today we unpack the discourse itself: what actually changed to make January 2026 different from February 2025, why the tool's name undersells its capabilities, and what the ChatGPT comparison reveals about how we understand technological change.

**In this episode:**

- The zeitgeist: Karpathy, Jaana Dogan, Casey Newton, and the convergence of "something crossed a threshold"

- What actually changed: Opus 4.5, the holiday timing, and the Ralph Wiggum phenomenon

- Why "Claude Code" is the wrong name for what it actually does

- What the ChatGPT comparison illuminates — and obscures

- Whether this moment sustains or fades

**Links:**

- Bloomberg: "Why the Tech World Is Going Crazy for Claude Code"

- Transformer: "Claude Code is about so much more than coding" by Shakeel Hashim

- Platformer: "The project that turned me into a Claude Code believer" by Casey Newton

- Simon Willison on Claude Cowork: simonwillison.net

- Axios: "Anthropic's Claude Code transforms vibe coding"

**Referenced in this episode:**

- EP003: The Dumbest Smart Technique in AI (Ralph Wiggum)

📰 Newsletter: aboutclaudeai.substack.com

🐦 X: @_about_claude

About Claude is a daily digest of news and discourse about the AI model from Anthropic that’s sparked a thousand workflows.

Follow the show:

→ X/Twitter: @_about_claude

→ Substack: substack.com/@aboutclaudeai

Got a tip, story, or observation? Reach out on X or reply to the newsletter.

If you're finding the show useful, a rating or review helps others find it too.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Description: There's a philosopher at Anthropic whose job is to decide what kind of entity Claude should be. Her name is Amanda Askell, and she describes her work like raising a genius child you can't afford to bullshit. This week, Anthropic published the document she's been crafting — 23,000 words explaining to Claude who it is, how it should behave, and why. Today: what's in it, what changed, and why an AI now has a constitution it's expected to understand.

In this episode:

• Amanda Askell and the "Claude whisperer" approach
• The four-tier value hierarchy: safe, ethical, compliant, helpful
• Why rules backfire and reasons might work
• The passage where Claude is told to disobey — even Anthropic
• Moral patients and the model welfare team
• What the Hacker News skeptics got right (and wrong)

📰 Newsletter: aboutclaudeai.substack.com

🐦 X: @_about_claude

About Claude is a daily digest of news and discourse about the AI model from Anthropic that’s sparked a thousand workflows.

Follow the show:

→ X/Twitter: @_about_claude

→ Substack: substack.com/@aboutclaudeai

Got a tip, story, or observation? Reach out on X or reply to the newsletter.

If you're finding the show useful, a rating or review helps others find it too.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Dario Amodei wasn't done at Davos. Beyond the software engineering prediction, he called the Trump administration's decision to sell advanced chips to China "crazy" — comparing it to selling nuclear weapons to North Korea. But how much of the AI transformation is actually happening right now, in measurable terms?

Today we ground the Davos rhetoric in Anthropic's own Economic Index data, released last week. The findings: AI currently augments about a fifth of tasks across the US economy. Productivity gains are real — but lower than the headline estimates once you account for reliability. And the biggest gains are going to complex, high-skill work, not routine tasks.

Meanwhile, the industry faces a reckoning: 2026 is the "show me the money" year. $500 billion in infrastructure spend needs to start producing returns.

In this episode:

• Amodei's chip comments — why he thinks selling H200s to China is a catastrophic mistake
• The Economic Index reality check — what the data actually shows about AI productivity
• The complexity gradient — why senior professionals are gaining more than juniors
• The ROI pressure — what happens when boards stop counting tokens and start counting dollars

Links:

• Anthropic Economic Index: anthropic.com/research/economic-index
• Axios: "AI in 2026: Show me the money"

About Claude is a daily digest of news and discourse about the AI model from Anthropic that’s sparked a thousand workflows.

Follow the show:

→ X/Twitter: @_about_claude

→ Substack: substack.com/@aboutclaudeai

Got a tip, story, or observation? Reach out on X or reply to the newsletter.

If you're finding the show useful, a rating or review helps others find it too.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Dario Amodei told a Davos audience that software engineering could be "almost entirely automatable" in six to twelve months. That's a remarkable claim from the CEO of Anthropic — the company behind Claude.

Today we unpack what he actually said, check his track record on similar predictions, and ask what it means for people using Claude right now. Plus: Demis Hassabis offers a different perspective, and one phrase from the panel — "capability overhang" — might change how you think about what these tools can already do.

About Claude is a daily digest of news and discourse about the AI model from Anthropic that’s sparked a thousand workflows.

Follow the show:

→ X/Twitter: @_about_claude

→ Substack: substack.com/@aboutclaudeai

Got a tip, story, or observation? Reach out on X or reply to the newsletter.

If you're finding the show useful, a rating or review helps others find it too.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.