Chemical Intent: The Limits of “Roid Rage” in Criminal Law

Impossible d'ajouter des articles

Désolé, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'ajouter l'article car votre panier est déjà plein.

Veuillez réessayer plus tard

Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.

Veuillez réessayer plus tard

Impossible de suivre le podcast

Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast

Chemical Intent: The Limits of “Roid Rage” in Criminal Law

Écouter gratuitement

Voir les détails

À propos de ce contenu audio

A forensic psychology and criminal law podcast analyzing “roid rage,” anabolic steroid effects on the brain, and how courts evaluate mens rea (criminal intent), voluntary intoxication, and legal responsibility in violent crime cases. This episode breaks down the intersection of neuroscience, behavioral evidence, and legal standards, featuring high-profile cases like Oscar Pistorius and legal precedents such as People v. Hood and R v. Kingston to examine why steroid defenses often fail in court. Designed for audiences interested in true crime, white collar crime, legal analysis, and clinical psychology, this content targets people who like topics such as criminal defense strategy, expert witness testimony, mental state defenses, and the psychology of violent offenders.

Aucun commentaire pour le moment