Couverture de Change Management in the Age of AI

Change Management in the Age of AI

Change Management in the Age of AI

Écouter gratuitement

Voir les détails

3 mois pour 0,99 €/mois

Après 3 mois, 9.95 €/mois. Offre soumise à conditions.

À propos de ce contenu audio

 52% of companies accelerated AI adoption after COVID. But almost none accelerated their change management at the same rate.The result? Organizations racing to deploy AI are ignoring the human side of change—creating unprecedented governance failures that expose executives to personal liability.Consider Healthline Media: California fined them $1.55 million for improperly sharing sensitive health-related browsing data with advertisers and AI-driven personalization systems without valid consent. Someone had to know what was going on. But no one did anything.It's a governance failure rooted in the change management they never did.**This episode exposes why AI transformation fails when you ignore the human perspective:****The Technology-First Trap**- 52% of companies accelerated AI adoption after COVID (PwC study)—but failed to accelerate change management- Only 20% of public-sector transformations meet their objectives—primarily due to change management failures- Organizations deploy AI as purely technology problem—ignoring sociological, organizational, human dimensions- Result: Technology works, implementation succeeds technically—but 18 months later, regulatory action**The Real Incident:**Mid-size financial services firm deployed AI across operations—trading algorithms, customer service chatbots, risk assessment models. Technology worked. But when regulators asked "How do you govern AI decision-making?"—no answer. Not because technology failed, but because organizational change never happened.- IT deployed systems- Business units used them- Legal never reviewed governance implications- HR never addressed workforce transition- Nobody owned the change**The TOP Framework Gap**Research identifies Technology, Organization, and People—all three dimensions must be addressed. Most organizations focus exclusively on technology:- Ignore organizational culture- Dismiss individual skills, training, motivation- 80% of CISOs report insufficient funding for robust cybersecurity—but funding isn't the real problem- Real problem: investing in technology without investing in organizational change to govern it**Five Psychological Resistance Factors:**When employees don't trust AI, they work around it—creating shadow AI nobody governs:1. **Opacity** - AI as "black box"2. **Emotionlessness** - AI as "unfeeling"3. **Rigidity** - AI as "inflexible"4. **Autonomy** - AI as "in control"5. **Group membership** - AI as "non-human"Resistance that isn't managed becomes governance gaps.**The Organizational Structure Problem:**- Need to break silo mentality toward matrix-based structures- Most organizations deploy AI within existing departmental boundaries—creating fragmented governance- Average CISO tenure: 18-24 months—not enough time to implement real organizational change- When CISOs turn over before change management complete, transformation stalls—governance gaps become permanent**Your Personal Liability:**Under current regulatory frameworks, "We deployed the technology" is not a defense. Regulators ask:- How do you govern it?- Who is accountable?- Where is the human oversight?**EU AI Act** requires human oversight of high-risk AI systems—that's organizational requirement, not technology:- Need people trained to provide oversight- Need processes that enable oversight- Need culture that values oversight over speed**NIS 2** allows personal penalties for executives who fail to ensure adequate risk management**DORA** holds management bodies personally accountable**SEC** examines board involvement in cybersecurity governanceNone ask: "Did you buy good technology?" They ask: "Did you build organizational capability to govern it?"**GDPR Violation:**Fully automated decision-making with significant impact on individuals without human input is illegal in the EU. If your AI is making decisions affecting people and you can't demonstrate human oversight—you have legal problem, not just governance problem.**The Three-Component Change Management Framework:**1. **Creation** - Give employees tools and motivation to engage with AI - Not training on how to use technology—building understanding of why it matters - Research shows trust increases when users see AI as comprehensible and aligned with human values - Without this: resistance2. **Reframing** - Challenge assumptions that obstruct AI adoption - Address legitimate concerns about AI alienating workers - Organizations that dismiss employee concerns don't overcome resistance—they drive it underground - Result: shadow AI and governance gaps3. **Integration** - Channel AI initiatives through proper governance structures - Every AI deployment needs: accountability assignment, policy documentation, monitoring, board reporting - But governance structures only work if organization has been transformed to support them - Change management isn't something you do before AI deployment—it's foundation that makes governance possible**The ...
Les membres Amazon Prime bénéficient automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts chez Audible.

Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?

Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.
Bonne écoute !
    Aucun commentaire pour le moment