In this episode we explore one of the most high-profile murder trials in Arizona history—the case against Steven DeMocker.

When Carol Kennedy was found bludgeoned to death in her Prescott home in 2008, suspicion quickly turned to her ex-husband. Despite the lack of direct physical evidence, DeMocker was arrested, tried, and ultimately convicted. But questions still linger: Was the evidence truly convincing? Did the prosecution go too far? And what does this case reveal about how circumstantial evidence can sway a jury?

Hosted by the attorneys at Grand Canyon Law Group, this episode brings former prosecutors and experienced defense lawyers together to analyze the complexities of the legal system and what’s at stake when your freedom is on the line.

In Part 2 of our two-part deep dive into the Baseline Killer case, we pick up where the chaos left off—when fear turned into focused pursuit.

As Phoenix police narrowed in on a suspect, what followed was a complex legal battle that included multiple trials, a deeply scrutinized investigation, and a courtroom saga that kept the public on edge.

In this episode, we break down:

• The arrest that ended the reign of terror
• The separate trials and how prosecutors built their case
• The conclusion of a legal battle years in the making
• A critical review of the trial strategy, outcome, and public reaction

Was justice truly served? Or did the process leave behind more questions than answers?

Join us as we close the chapter on one of Arizona’s most disturbing true crime stories—and examine what justice really looked like in the aftermath.

In this episode, we plunge headfirst into the terrifying saga of the Baseline Killer—a violent predator who turned Phoenix into a city gripped by fear.

Between 2005 and 2006, this elusive figure committed a series of brutal crimes: sexual assaults, kidnappings, and murders that left neighborhoods paralyzed. No one knew where he would strike next, or why.

In Part 1 of this two-part series, we cover:

• The haunting timeline of the Baseline Killer’s attacks
• The key victims and how their lives were forever changed
• The rising panic as a city lived in the shadow of a faceless threat
• The early missteps and challenges in the investigation

As the terror unfolded, Phoenix residents were forced to confront a nightmare that seemed to have no end.

Stay tuned—in Part 2, we reveal how police finally unmasked the fear.

The Harold Fish Case – A Fatal Hike in Arizona

In this gripping episode, we dive into one of Arizona’s most controversial self-defense cases: the 2004 shooting of Grant Kuenzli by retired schoolteacher Harold Fish.

What started as a peaceful solo hike in the Coconino National Forest turned deadly within minutes. Fish claimed he was forced to fire in self-defense after being charged by Kuenzli, who had aggressively confronted him—following a dispute over two unleashed dogs.

Fish was convicted of second-degree murder in 2006 and sentenced to a decade in prison. But years later, that conviction was overturned. What changed? And what does this case tell us about the justice system, gun rights, and the ever-blurry line between self-defense and excessive force?

In this episode, we explore:

• The facts and timeline of the shooting
• The prosecution's theory vs. the defense's strategy
• The role of Kuenzli’s dogs—and their impact on the case
• The trial, conviction, and the appeal that reversed it all
• How this case helped reshape self-defense laws in Arizona

Was this truly a justified shooting? Or a deadly overreaction?

Tune in as we unpack the legal, moral, and societal implications of the Harold Fish case—and why it still sparks debate two decades later.

Would you believe someone could stab their spouse, drag them into a pool, and claim they were asleep the entire time?

In this episode, we unpack one of Arizona’s most bizarre and controversial murder cases: the trial of Scott Falater, also known as The Sleepwalking Killer.

Join Grand Canyon Law Group owners and seasoned defense attorneys Ryan McPhie and David Lish as they break down:

• The shocking facts of the case and the eye-witness testimony
• The defense’s argument of automatism and sleepwalking
• Why Falater’s legal team argued the trial was unfair
• The deeper ethical questions this case raises for defense attorneys

This isn't your average true crime podcast. We're digging into the courtroom strategy, jury dynamics, and legal principles that shaped the outcome — and whether justice was really served.