What would a claim to be God have sounded like in the first century? Is it reasonable to demand “say it our way,” or is that the wrong test? Would it need a sentence, or could actions say it better? What’s a fair standard to use across time?

Is it possible to be wrong about something while still talking about the same thing? Same word, same reality… or not? This episode maps the line between identity and interpretation. Short, sharp, and a little mind-bendy, but a Superman reference makes it all worth it.

Misinterpretation of God's word has been the move since Genesis 3, If the devil can weaponize verses, what protects the faithful?

Jesus answers each temptation with the word in its true sense.

Can sola Scriptura deliver that same certainty? or does the New Testament point somewhere else?

In the words of St. Francis De Sales “Show me your miracles, or show me your mission; otherwise, I cannot believe you are sent from God.”

When God turns a page in salvation history, He leaves fingerprints.

This episode asks whether the 16th-century protestant reformation has any.

Can “Scripture alone” erase the Church that received and canonized Scripture? Today we test sola Scriptura on logic: canon certainty, who decides disputes, and effect vs. cause.

This episode covers Chesterton’s “procession,” plus constitution and music analogies. Not anti-Bible, but rather pro-Incarnation.

This episode challenges the popular claim that the Catholic Church “kept the Bible from the people,” arguing instead for a consistent pattern of access with fidelity. What if the usual narrative is missing something essential? Today we explore how access and authority relate, and why it matters more than ever, from the Vulgate’s vernacular origins, to William Tyndale, to a modern case study on why translation needs guardrails.

An exploration of how language can drift from reality, and what happens when words keep their sound but lose their substance. Even tiny redefinitions can alter our thinking, our life together, and even our sense of right and wrong. The question then becomes: what keeps language, and by proxy us, anchored to reality? What guards truth when words become negotiable?

What makes a doctrine “unbiblical”? Silence? contradiction? lack of inference? or something else? This episode compares the leading approaches across Protestant schools of thought on the issue and then contrasts them with the older rule of faith that guided the Church’s reading from the start. What has to be in place for “biblical” to be more than a personal label? The answer, inevitably reshapes the whole debate.