This content provides a clear overview of legal doctrines used to determine fault and compensation in auto accidents. It explains:

Learning Objectives (with Examples)

By the end of this lesson, learners will be able to:

• Define and distinguish between negligence per se, comparative negligence, and contributory negligence. Example: Learners will explain how running a red light qualifies as negligence per se.
• Analyze fault and compensation using real-world scenarios. Example: Learners will calculate damages when a driver is 40% at fault in a two-car collision.
• Identify jurisdictional differences in negligence rules. Example: Learners will compare Minnesota’s modified comparative rule to Virginia’s contributory rule.

✅ Learning Outcomes (with Examples)

Learners will demonstrate:

• Accurate definitions of each doctrine. Example: “Negligence per se occurs when a driver violates a traffic law and causes harm.”
• Application of fault percentages to determine compensation. Example: “If a driver is 25% at fault and suffers $10,000 in damages, they can recover $7,500.”
• Jurisdictional awareness of legal doctrines. Example: “In Maryland, a pedestrian who jaywalks and is hit by a speeding car may receive no compensation due to contributory negligence.”

📝 Assessment Activities

• Quick Quiz: Match each doctrine to its definition.
• Scenario Analysis: Learners evaluate fault and compensation in sample cases (e.g., a texting driver hitting a cyclist).
• Discussion Prompt: “Should contributory negligence still be legal? Why or why not?”

🧪 Teaching Examples

• Negligence Per Se: A driver runs a stop sign and hits a pedestrian. This is negligence per se because the driver violated a traffic law.
• Comparative Negligence: A speeding driver hits another who failed to signal. Under comparative negligence, fault is shared—if Driver A is 60% at fault and Driver B is 40%, Driver B can recover 60% of their damages.
• Contributory Negligence: A jaywalking pedestrian is hit by a distracted driver. In contributory negligence states, the pedestrian may be barred from recovering damages—even if the driver was mostly at fault.

Comments: educatorsocialscience@gmail.com or call 773-809-8594