What happens when AI use among university students doubles in a single year and institutions are still catching up?

To mark the launch of Coursera's 2026 AI on Campus Report, Marni Baker Stein, Chief Content Officer, and Jack Moran, Global Enterprise PR Manager, join me to discuss the findings. With nearly half of UK students now using AI to complete their study tasks and 80% reporting improved grades, the data raises urgent questions about what we are actually measuring when we talk about academic success in an AI-augmented world.

This conversation explores whether better grades signal deeper learning or simply more polished outputs, why the race to detect AI-generated work is one institutions are already losing, and what it would mean to genuinely redesign assessment for an AI-enabled generation. Marni and Jack also make a compelling case that AI, if intentionally designed, has the potential to strengthen belonging and reduce equity gaps rather than widen them, pointing to evidence from Coursera's own platform that underserved learners are among the most active users of AI tutoring tools.

We discuss the tension between student enthusiasm and educator anxiety, why fewer than a third of UK universities have a formal AI policy despite the scale of adoption, and what it means for institutions to move from reactive policies to proactive frameworks that put faculty confidence and student equity at the centre.

AI Ethics Now

Exploring the ethical dilemmas of AI in Higher Education and beyond.

A University of Warwick IATL Podcast

This podcast series was developed by Dr Tom Ritchie and Dr Jennie Mills, the module leads of the ⁠ at the University of Warwick. The AI Revolution module explores the history, current state, and potential futures of artificial intelligence, examining its profound impact on society, individuals, and the very definition of 'humanness.'

This podcast was initially designed to provide a deeper dive into the key themes explored each week in class. We want to share the discussions we have had to help offer a broader, interdisciplinary perspective on the ethical and societal implications of artificial intelligence to a wider audience.

Join each fortnight for new critical conversations on AI Ethics with local, national, and international experts.

We will discuss:

• Ethical Dimensions of AI: Fairness, bias, transparency, and accountability.
• Societal Implications: How AI is transforming industries, economies, and our understanding of humanity.
• The Future of AI: Potential benefits, risks, and shaping a future where AI serves humanity.

If you want to join the podcast as a guest, contact Tom.Ritchie@warwick.ac.uk.

When AI agents can navigate systems autonomously, where do you draw the line between efficiency and control?

Ed Crook, VP Strategy & Operations at DeepL, reveals how the company shifted from specialised translation to launching autonomous AI agents, and why human-in-the-loop oversight remains non-negotiable even as agentic AI scales across heavily regulated industries.

This conversation explores how DeepL agents work through a secondary browser interface where users can view real-time navigation, pause, raise their hand, and take or relinquish control at any time. Ed explains why the agent asks when unsure, building trust the same way you'd work with a new colleague, rather than locking themselves in a dark room until 5pm. We discuss where users still actively request control (login access, sensitive systems), what 20,000 completed tasks during beta testing revealed about when AI needs intervention, and why agents can flawlessly complete advanced tasks yet fail at very basic ones.

Ed shares how DeepL works with financial services, pharmaceuticals, and legal professionals navigating compliance requirements whilst exploring agentic AI. Over half of legal professionals report AI lets them spend more time on high-judgment strategic tasks, and two-thirds are already exploring agentic systems. He explains why shadow AI shouldn't be vilified but understood as employees seeking productivity.

We discuss how the EU AI Act encourages proportionate responses where high-risk applications carry high responsibility, why having European-built AI success stories matters, and how centrally managed AI tools create governance oversight whilst enabling peer learning across teams. Ed reveals the education gap: access to AI tools has grown faster than training on responsible use, and why upskilling, both technical and conceptual, is the burning priority for companies navigating AI adoption.

The challenge: build agents that combine autonomy with human judgment, scale AI adoption with responsible governance, and future-proof teams through peer learning rather than just technical training.

AI Ethics Now

Exploring the ethical dilemmas of AI in Higher Education and beyond.

A University of Warwick IATL Podcast

This podcast series was developed by Dr Tom Ritchie and Dr Jennie Mills, the module leads of the ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠IATL module ⁠"The AI Revolution: Ethics, Technology, and Society"⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ at the University of Warwick. The AI Revolution module explores the history, current state, and potential futures of artificial intelligence, examining its profound impact on society, individuals, and the very definition of 'humanness.'

This podcast was initially designed to provide a deeper dive into the key themes explored each week in class. We want to share the discussions we have had to help offer a broader, interdisciplinary perspective on the ethical and societal implications of artificial intelligence to a wider audience.

Join each fortnight for new critical conversations on AI Ethics with local, national, and international experts.

We will discuss:

• Ethical Dimensions of AI: Fairness, bias, transparency, and accountability.
• Societal Implications: How AI is transforming industries, economies, and our understanding of humanity.
• The Future of AI: Potential benefits, risks, and shaping a future where AI serves humanity.

If you want to join the podcast as a guest, contact Tom.Ritchie@warwick.ac.uk.

How do we prevent AI from amplifying destructive environmental narratives at a massive scale - potentially 100 billion words per day?

Mariana Roccia and Jorge Vallego, from the H4rmony Project, reveal how ecolinguistics and ecosophies can reshape how large language models engage with ecological issues whilst addressing cultural and linguistic bias in AI-generated environmental discourse.

This conversation explores how mainstream LLMs celebrate Coca-Cola as a "cultural icon" or patio heaters as "brilliant" without acknowledging environmental costs unless explicitly challenged. The team shares how they developed Theophrastus, an open-source assistant built on ChatGPT, instructed with an ecosophy: a living framework of ecological values that guides language generation toward planetary well-being rather than profit.

We discuss how word embeddings cluster dominant narratives together in multidimensional space, why fine-tuning and reinforcement learning can shift those embeddings toward ecologically aligned responses, and how system prompts embed ecosophy into every AI interaction. The team explains their approach using preference datasets rather than imposed answers, working with the International Ecolinguistics Association's 1,500+ researchers to ensure cultural and linguistic representation.

Mariana discusses why language representation matters, explaining how AI models are predominantly trained in English, which risks amplifying cultural imbalances and losing local ecological knowledge that's vital for different cultures. Jorge explains why transparency around environmental ethics in AI matters as much as addressing carbon footprint, and why major AI players need to adopt ecosophies just as they address gender and racial bias.

This episode continues our new short series featuring conversations from the ⁠⁠⁠Building Bridges: A Symposium on Human-AI Interaction⁠⁠⁠ held at the University of Warwick on 21 November 2025. The symposium was organised by ⁠⁠⁠Dr Yanyan Li⁠⁠⁠, Xianzhi Chen, and Kaiqi Yu, and jointly funded by the Institute of Advanced Study Conversations Scheme and the Doctoral College Networking Fund, with sponsorship from Warwick Students' Union.

AI Ethics Now

Exploring the ethical dilemmas of AI in Higher Education and beyond.

A University of Warwick IATL Podcast

This podcast series was developed by Dr Tom Ritchie and Dr Jennie Mills, the module leads of the ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠IATL module ⁠"The AI Revolution: Ethics, Technology, and Society"⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ at the University of Warwick. The AI Revolution module explores the history, current state, and potential futures of artificial intelligence, examining its profound impact on society, individuals, and the very definition of 'humanness.'

This podcast was initially designed to provide a deeper dive into the key themes explored each week in class. We want to share the discussions we have had to help offer a broader, interdisciplinary perspective on the ethical and societal implications of artificial intelligence to a wider audience.

Join each fortnight for new critical conversations on AI Ethics with local, national, and international experts.

We will discuss:

• Ethical Dimensions of AI: Fairness, bias, transparency, and accountability.
• Societal Implications: How AI is transforming industries, economies, and our understanding of humanity.
• The Future of AI: Potential benefits, risks, and shaping a future where AI serves humanity.

If you want to join the podcast as a guest, contact Tom.Ritchie@warwick.ac.uk.

What happens when AI becomes a dialogic partner in feedback rather than a replacement for human judgment?

Dr Viktoria Magne, Dr Rebecca Mace, Sarah Hooper, and Dr Sharon Vince from the University of West London and University of Worcester reveal how structured AI conversations are helping students engage more deeply with feedback whilst keeping academic judgment clearly human-led.

This conversation explores how AI creates low-stakes, judgment-free spaces where students can question, challenge, and co-construct understanding without fear of looking silly or upsetting relationships with staff. The team shares how they've designed reflective cycles using structured prompts that position students as active agents rather than passive recipients, and why this matters for equity, emotional safety, and critical AI literacy.

We discuss the difference between transactional and dialogic AI use, why feedback shouldn't feel like static judgment, how AI helps students engage in "conversation with themselves", and what happens when first-generation students gain access to a network they've never had before. The team explains why digital literacy means learning to question AI outputs, not just operate tools, and how transparency around staff AI use builds trust.

This episode continues our new short series featuring conversations from the ⁠⁠Building Bridges: A Symposium on Human-AI Interaction⁠⁠ held at the University of Warwick on 21 November 2025. The symposium was organised by ⁠⁠Dr Yanyan Li⁠⁠, Xianzhi Chen, and Kaiqi Yu, and jointly funded by the Institute of Advanced Study Conversations Scheme and the Doctoral College Networking Fund, with sponsorship from Warwick Students' Union.

AI Ethics Now

Exploring the ethical dilemmas of AI in Higher Education and beyond.

A University of Warwick IATL Podcast

This podcast series was developed by Dr Tom Ritchie and Dr Jennie Mills, the module leads of the ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠IATL module ⁠"The AI Revolution: Ethics, Technology, and Society"⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ at the University of Warwick. The AI Revolution module explores the history, current state, and potential futures of artificial intelligence, examining its profound impact on society, individuals, and the very definition of 'humanness.'

This podcast was initially designed to provide a deeper dive into the key themes explored each week in class. We want to share the discussions we have had to help offer a broader, interdisciplinary perspective on the ethical and societal implications of artificial intelligence to a wider audience.

Join each fortnight for new critical conversations on AI Ethics with local, national, and international experts.

We will discuss:

• Ethical Dimensions of AI: Fairness, bias, transparency, and accountability.
• Societal Implications: How AI is transforming industries, economies, and our understanding of humanity.
• The Future of AI: Potential benefits, risks, and shaping a future where AI serves humanity.

If you want to join the podcast as a guest, contact Tom.Ritchie@warwick.ac.uk.

What happens when students delegate not just writing, but reasoning itself to AI?

Chahna Gonsalves, Senior Lecturer at King's Business School, reveals how generative AI is transforming critical thinking in higher education through what she calls "epistemic offloading", the process of outsourcing intellectual work to tools like ChatGPT.

This conversation examines how students are using AI to interpret readings, generate argument structures, and pre-evaluate their own work, shifting responsibility for core intellectual tasks. Chahna explores why AI prizes polish over depth, how this affects students' evaluative judgment, and what happens when students ask "does this sound like me?"

We discuss the equity implications of tech-savviness, why reflexive AI use matters more than bans, and how Bloom's Taxonomy reveals which cognitive processes students readily offload versus protect. Chahna argues we need transparent conversations about delegation, judgment, and what truly requires human reasoning.

Essential listening for anyone grappling with AI's role in learning, assessment design, and the future of thinking itself.

This episode continues our new short series featuring conversations from the ⁠Building Bridges: A Symposium on Human-AI Interaction⁠ held at the University of Warwick on 21 November 2025. The symposium was organised by ⁠Dr Yanyan Li⁠, Xianzhi Chen, and Kaiqi Yu, and jointly funded by the Institute of Advanced Study Conversations Scheme and the Doctoral College Networking Fund, with sponsorship from Warwick Students' Union.

AI Ethics Now

Exploring the ethical dilemmas of AI in Higher Education and beyond.

A University of Warwick IATL Podcast

This podcast series was developed by Dr Tom Ritchie and Dr Jennie Mills, the module leads of the ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠IATL module ⁠"The AI Revolution: Ethics, Technology, and Society"⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ at the University of Warwick. The AI Revolution module explores the history, current state, and potential futures of artificial intelligence, examining its profound impact on society, individuals, and the very definition of 'humanness.'

This podcast was initially designed to provide a deeper dive into the key themes explored each week in class. We want to share the discussions we have had to help offer a broader, interdisciplinary perspective on the ethical and societal implications of artificial intelligence to a wider audience.

Join each fortnight for new critical conversations on AI Ethics with local, national, and international experts.

We will discuss:

• Ethical Dimensions of AI: Fairness, bias, transparency, and accountability.
• Societal Implications: How AI is transforming industries, economies, and our understanding of humanity.
• The Future of AI: Potential benefits, risks, and shaping a future where AI serves humanity.

If you want to join the podcast as a guest, contact Tom.Ritchie@warwick.ac.uk.

Do you use ChatGPT or Claude daily for work?

Mark Carrigan, Senior Lecturer in Education at Manchester Institute of Education, joins the podcast to discuss why we might be misdiagnosing the harms of generative AI. His research suggests the problems aren't inherent to the technology itself, but arise when AI systems meet the already broken bureaucracies of higher education and other sectors.

Mark introduces the LLM Interaction Cycle, a framework he developed with philosopher of technology, Milan Stürmer, to understand how we engage with AI over time through three phases: positioning (how we assign roles to the AI), articulation (how we put our needs into words), and attunement (the sense that the AI understands us). He explains how use that begins as purely transactional often drifts toward something more affective as models build memory and context about us, and why this drift matters for how we think about ethical AI use.

We go on to explore teacher agency in the age of generative AI, examining why fear of appearing ignorant prevents honest conversations between educators and students. Mark discusses three key risks facing universities:

• lock-in (dependency on specific platforms),
• loss of reflection (increasingly habitual rather than thoughtful use), and;
• commercial capture (vendor interests shaping institutional practices).

He argues that reflective use isn't just beneficial but ethically necessary, yet the pressures facing academics and students make reflection increasingly difficult.

The conversation finishes by examining why universities in financial crisis are particularly vulnerable to both the promises and pitfalls of AI adoption, how institutional AI strategies risk creating new waves of disruption, and why understanding student realities (including significant paid work commitments) is essential to addressing concerns about AI in education. Mark concludes by making the case that we cannot understand the problems of generative AI without understanding the wider systemic crisis in higher education.

This episode launches our new short series featuring conversations from the Building Bridges: A Symposium on Human-AI Interaction held at the University of Warwick on 21 November 2025. The symposium was organised by Dr Yanyan Li, Xianzhi Chen, and Kaiqi Yu, and jointly funded by the Institute of Advanced Study Conversations Scheme and the Doctoral College Networking Fund, with sponsorship from Warwick Students' Union.

AI Ethics Now

Exploring the ethical dilemmas of AI in Higher Education and beyond.

A University of Warwick IATL Podcast

This podcast series was developed by Dr Tom Ritchie and Dr Jennie Mills, the module leads of the ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠IATL module ⁠"The AI Revolution: Ethics, Technology, and Society"⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ at the University of Warwick. The AI Revolution module explores the history, current state, and potential futures of artificial intelligence, examining its profound impact on society, individuals, and the very definition of 'humanness.'

This podcast was initially designed to provide a deeper dive into the key themes explored each week in class. We want to share the discussions we have had to help offer a broader, interdisciplinary perspective on the ethical and societal implications of artificial intelligence to a wider audience.

Join each fortnight for new critical conversations on AI Ethics with local, national, and international experts.

We will discuss:

• Ethical Dimensions of AI: Fairness, bias, transparency, and accountability.
• Societal Implications: How AI is transforming industries, economies, and our understanding of humanity.
• The Future of AI: Potential benefits, risks, and shaping a future where AI serves humanity.

If you want to join the podcast as a guest, contact Tom.Ritchie@warwick.ac.uk.

As you search for Christmas gifts this season, have you asked ChatGPT or Gemini for recommendations? Katarina Mpofu and Jasmine Rienecker from Stupid Human join the podcast to discuss their research examining how AI systems influence public opinion and decision-making. Conducted in collaboration with the University of Oxford, their study analysed over 8,000 AI-generated responses to uncover systematic biases in how AI systems like ChatGPT and Gemini recommend brands, institutions, and governments.

Their findings reveal that AI assistants aren't neutral—they have structured and persistent preferences that favour specific entities regardless of how questions are asked or who's asking. ChatGPT consistently recommended Nike for running shoes in over 90% of queries, whilst both models claimed the US has the best national healthcare system. These preferences extend beyond consumer products into government policy and educational institutions, raising critical questions about fairness, neutrality, and AI's role in shaping global narratives.

We explore how AI assistants are more persuasive than human debaters, why users trust these systems as sources of truth without questioning their recommendations, and how geographic and cultural biases develop through training data, semantic associations, and user feedback amplification. Katarina and Jasmine explain why language matters - asking in English produces US-centric biases regardless of where you're located - and discuss the implications for smaller brands, niche markets, and diverse user groups systematically disadvantaged by current AI design.

The conversation examines whether companies understand they're building these preferences into systems, the challenge of cross-domain bias contamination, and the urgent need for frameworks to identify and benchmark AI biases beyond protected characteristics like race and gender.

AI Ethics Now

Exploring the ethical dilemmas of AI in Higher Education and beyond.

A University of Warwick IATL Podcast

This podcast series was developed by Dr Tom Ritchie and Dr Jennie Mills, the module leads of the ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠IATL module ⁠"The AI Revolution: Ethics, Technology, and Society"⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ at the University of Warwick. The AI Revolution module explores the history, current state, and potential futures of artificial intelligence, examining its profound impact on society, individuals, and the very definition of 'humanness.'

This podcast was initially designed to provide a deeper dive into the key themes explored each week in class. We want to share the discussions we have had to help offer a broader, interdisciplinary perspective on the ethical and societal implications of artificial intelligence to a wider audience.

Join each fortnight for new critical conversations on AI Ethics with local, national, and international experts.

We will discuss:

• Ethical Dimensions of AI: Fairness, bias, transparency, and accountability.
• Societal Implications: How AI is transforming industries, economies, and our understanding of humanity.
• The Future of AI: Potential benefits, risks, and shaping a future where AI serves humanity.

If you want to join the podcast as a guest, contact Tom.Ritchie@warwick.ac.uk.

In this episode, Max Sebti, co-founder and CEO of Score, challenges the centralised control of computer vision systems and makes the case for decentralised AI as a matter of public interest.

Max brings experience from AI data annotation and model development, where he witnessed how closed systems collect and control vast amounts of visual data. Now at Score, running on the Bittensor network, he's building "open source computer vision" - systems that are publicly verifiable, permissionless, and collectively owned rather than corporately controlled.

His central argument: we face a choice between "own AI or be owned by AI." As computer vision expands from sport into healthcare, insurance, and public surveillance, who controls these systems becomes existential. Max argues citizens should have access to model weights and training data as a democratic necessity.

We explore what decentralisation means in practice: how Bittensor's incentive mechanisms unlock talent and data centralised systems can't access, why open source doesn't sacrifice performance, and the stark reality that camera systems are making decisions about you based on models you cannot see.

Max introduces competing visions: a "Skynet" scenario where private entities own all visual data, versus a "solar punk" future of abundant energy and AGI where open AI serves collective benefit. The difference? Transparency, accountability, and public ownership.

The conversation tackles thorny questions: where should boundaries exist in open systems? How do you prevent misuse whilst maintaining accessibility? Max admits his team hasn't solved this - decentralised AI means thousands of contributors with different values building toward the same goal.

Max closes with a call to action: push for open source AI models where people can verify, query, and hold systems accountable. His vision moves AI from corporate product to public utility - not because it's idealistic, but because the alternative is too dangerous.

AI Ethics Now

Exploring the ethical dilemmas of AI in Higher Education and beyond.

A University of Warwick IATL Podcast

This podcast series was developed by Dr Tom Ritchie and Dr Jennie Mills, the module leads of the ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠IATL module ⁠"The AI Revolution: Ethics, Technology, and Society"⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ at the University of Warwick. The AI Revolution module explores the history, current state, and potential futures of artificial intelligence, examining its profound impact on society, individuals, and the very definition of 'humanness.'

This podcast was initially designed to provide a deeper dive into the key themes explored each week in class. We want to share the discussions we have had to help offer a broader, interdisciplinary perspective on the ethical and societal implications of artificial intelligence to a wider audience.

Join each fortnight for new critical conversations on AI Ethics with local, national, and international experts.

We will discuss:

• Ethical Dimensions of AI: Fairness, bias, transparency, and accountability.
• Societal Implications: How AI is transforming industries, economies, and our understanding of humanity.
• The Future of AI: Potential benefits, risks, and shaping a future where AI serves humanity.

If you want to join the podcast as a guest, contact Tom.Ritchie@warwick.ac.uk.