A Philosophical Framework
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
A Philosophical Framework
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
Season 4 kicks off and Marshall is way too excited to be back. He promised Gunter this episode would be “crazy” because it’s built on a philosophical framework. Gunter’s already scared.
It all starts with a new Tennessee law about what gender can be listed on a driver’s license and the ACLU’s lawsuit against the state. Marshall has a “solution” to the issue—but Gunter refuses to go along with his plan (unintentionally derailing it). From there, things go completely sideways.
We find out Marshall once wanted to be a political candidate (try to picture it). He rants about torches, considers sponsoring a dirt track racing team (but decides their fans might not be Northern Aggression’s audience), and reminisces about the internet before Google.
They dive into songs that could never be released today, and Marshall revives his favorite analogy—lip fillers are like hot dogs. Just when you think the “philosophical framework” is done, he takes on the age of consent, shares various international viewpoints, and somehow asks, “Was Mark Twain into lesbians?”
By the end, you’ll have no idea how you got here—but you’ll be glad you came along.
Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?
Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.Bonne écoute !