40-Years Of Research On Motion Control Running Shoes?
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
This podcast argues that the long-standing concept of motion control in running shoes lacks a foundation in scientific evidence. Despite decades of commercial marketing and professional recommendations, peer-reviewed research shows that these shoes only alter joint movement by negligible margins that often fall within the range of natural variability. Studies indicate that while footwear can slightly influence rearfoot motion, the effects are too small and inconsistent to justify the term "control." Because the data fails to support the industry's kinematic claims, the author suggests that the current product terminology is misleading and should be retired. Instead of relying on footwear categories, the source posits that actual stability is a complex interaction between ground forces and the human neuromotor system. An honest,scienficially rational, and evidence-based new taxonomy for the classification of running shoes is proposed.
Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?
Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.Bonne écoute !