Couverture de #278 Venerating Death

#278 Venerating Death

#278 Venerating Death

Écouter gratuitement

Voir les détails

À propos de ce contenu audio

 This program is being recorded on Thursday, January 27, 2022, five days after the 49th anniversary of the infamous Roe v Wade decision that abolished all laws throughout the United States that restricted abortions, thus declaring open season on children in their pre-natal stage of development and exempting abortion providers from liability for the damage done to the mothers. The Roe v Wade decision was one of the most egregious, and anti-Constitutional, rulings of the Supreme Court, rivaling the Dred Scott decision, the Plessy v Ferguson decision, Lawrence v Texas, and Obergefell v Hodges. The Dred Scott decision denied the citizenship of Negros, declared them to be property, and helped precipitate the Civil War of 1861; the Plessy v Ferguson decision affirmed the "separate but equal" policy of segregating white and black children in government schools, condemning black children to substandard educational facilities; Lawrence v Texas abolished all anti-sodomy laws and opened the door to the legitimization of total sexual anarchy; Obergefell v Hodges legitimized same-sex marriage, thus declaring war on reality, undermining the social fabric, and calling Jesus Christ a liar (Mark 10:6-7 from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; 11-12 And he saith unto them, Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her. And if a woman shall put away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery). As a disclaimer, politically I am an active member of the Republican Party. I am pro-life because I support Biblical morality and the US Constitution, which, per the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, guarantees us that our right to life can't be taken from us without due process of law. The Democrat Party will not accept people who are pro-life, so I can't be a Democrat. Abortion is almost a sacrament to the people who control the Democrat Party, a fact that I intend to substantiate during this program based on political and monetary solicitations that I have received from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Why they would send me such solicitations is puzzling. I am a Republican, but I am not a party hack. I took an oath to protect and defend the US Constitution from all enemies, both foreign and domestic, not to advance any particular political organization. For that reason, I refer to myself as a centrist: I support politically those who support the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence and their underlying principles. Before I continue, I want to remind us all of Dr. Stan Monteith's opening statement on his program "Radio Liberty," which was broadcast on the American Christian Network for many years. Dr. Monteith always opened his program with the following statement: "Reality is usually scoffed at; illusion is usually king. But in the battle for the survival of Western Civilization it will be reality, not illusion or delusion, that will determine what the outcome will be." Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote an essay entitled "Live Not by Lies." In it, he urged people to always conform to the truth and never go along with lies, even if the consequences were unpleasant or harmful. Solzhenitsyn's fervent embrace of the truth resulted in him spending 8 years in a gulag in the former Soviet Union and eventually caused him to be exiled. Only if we, as individuals, are willing to stand for the truth no matter what, we will remain free from subjugation. Jesus said: John 8:32 ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. "The Supreme Court recognized that abortion does fall under women's privacy rights. [My comments: The 14th Amendment reads, in part: "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." In other words, you can't be executed, incarcerated, or fined without having your day in court with the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights. I don't see any "right to privacy," nor does privacy have anything to do with killing your child. The supreme justices justified their ruling by appealing to a concept they call "emanations from the penumbra." In other words, they act as dictators with no constraints. This is legislating from the bench and a violation of the Constitution, which limits all legislative powers to the Congress, per Article I, Section 1. Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798: "in questions of power then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the constitution." When the judges can conjure "penumbras" to justify their decisions in contradiction of the US Constitution, the Constitution becomes simply a stage prop.] The justices acknowledged that being forced to continue a pregnancy puts a lot at risk for women, such as: Physical ...
Aucun commentaire pour le moment