15: Bogus, But Not Like That
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Désolé, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'ajouter l'article car votre panier est déjà plein.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
15: Bogus, But Not Like That
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
How did ASHA come to link membership and certification? And what happened when that structure was challenged? In the 1970s, one SLP brought that question into federal court. While Bogus v. ASHA didn’t end with a dramatic verdict, it quietly reshaped the professional architecture we still live inside today.
We explore:
- The tying logic: Why the court viewed the CCC as a unique form of economic influence, even when labeled “optional.
- The quiet settlement: How the case unfolded largely out of public view, including within ASHA’s own leadership.
- Member vs. certificate holder: How the center of gravity shifted from association to credential over time.
- The price of friction: Why the narrow gap between member and non-member options reflects institutional risk management, not indifference.
Sources:
- Malone, R. (1999). The first 75 years: An oral history of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
- Bogus v. American Speech & Hearing Association, 389 F. Supp. 327 (E.D. Pa. 1975).
Connect:
- Contact Megan: therapyinsights.com/insideslp
- PACT Survey: pactsurvey.com
Aucun commentaire pour le moment