13: Following the Money Without Losing the Plot
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Désolé, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'ajouter l'article car votre panier est déjà plein.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
13: Following the Money Without Losing the Plot
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
When we ask why change inside SLP feels so difficult, we often look to policy debates or leadership decisions. This episode looks instead at the financial architecture underneath it all and why long-term obligations shape what an institution can realistically risk.
To understand ASHA’s caution, we examine the scale of the organization and the financial commitments that anchor it in place.
We explore:
- The 5-to-1 gap: What ASHA’s financial scale looks like compared to the American Occupational Therapy Association.
- Long-term commitments: How maintaining a defined benefit pension plan created enduring revenue requirements.
- Exit costs: Why unwinding decades-old obligations isn’t as simple as restructuring fees or programs.
Sources:
- 2024 ASHA Audited Financial Report
- ProPublica Data for ASHA
- ProPublica Data for AOTA
- Green, J. (2024, January 12). How 1978 shifted power in America and laid the groundwork for our current political moment. TPM.
Connect:
- Contact Megan: therapyinsights.com/insideslp
- PACT Survey: pactsurvey.com
Aucun commentaire pour le moment