Couverture de The Theory That Would Not Die

The Theory That Would Not Die

How Bayes' Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines, and Emerged Triumphant from Two Centuries of Controversy

Aperçu
Offre à durée limitée

3 mois d'Audible Standard gratuits

3 mois pour 0,00 €/mois, puis 5,99 €/mois. Possibilité de résilier chaque mois.
Essayez pour 0,00 €/mois
L'offre prend fin le 15 Juillet 2026 à 23 h 59.
Plus d'options d'achat

The Theory That Would Not Die

De : Sharon Bertsch McGrayne
Lu par : Laural Merlington
Essayez pour 0,00 €/mois

3 mois pour 0,99 €/mois, puis 5,99 €/mois. Possibilité de résilier chaque mois. Offre valable jusqu'au 15 juillet 2026 à 23 h 59.

Acheter pour 17,99 €

Acheter pour 17,99 €

Bayes' rule appears to be a straightforward, one-line theorem: by updating our initial beliefs with objective new information, we get a new and improved belief. To its adherents, it is an elegant statement about learning from experience. To its opponents, it is subjectivity run amok.

In the first-ever account of Bayes' rule for general readers and listeners, Sharon Bertsch McGrayne explores this controversial theorem and the human obsessions surrounding it. She traces its discovery by an amateur mathematician in the 1740s through its development into roughly its modern form by French scientist Pierre Simon Laplace. She reveals why respected statisticians rendered it professionally taboo for 150 years - at the same time that practitioners relied on it to solve crises involving great uncertainty and scanty information, even breaking Germany's Enigma code during World War II, and explains how the advent of off-the-shelf computer technology in the 1980s proved to be a game-changer. Today, Bayes' rule is used everywhere from DNA decoding to Homeland Security.

Drawing on primary source material and interviews with statisticians and other scientists, The Theory That Would Not Die is the riveting account of how a seemingly simple theorem ignited one of the greatest controversies of all time.

©2011 Sharon Bertsch McGrayne (P)2012 Tantor
Mathématiques Science
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1

Commentaires

"If you are not thinking like a Bayesian, perhaps you should be." ( New York Times Book Review)
Aucun commentaire pour le moment