Votre titre Audible gratuit

9,95 € / mois après 30 jours. Résiliable à tout moment.

ou
Dans le panier

Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?

Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.
Bonne écoute !

    Description

    Mainstream SETI scientists and ancient alien theorists don't agree on much, but one opinion they share is that the undisputed authority on the possibility of alien existence was the late Carl Sagan (1934-1996), whose voluminous writings on the subject have had a profound influence on ETI research.

    But how many Carl Sagan fans know that while the renowned scientist was at Stanford University, he produced a controversial paper, funded by a NASA research grant, that concludes that ancient alien intervention may have sparked human civilization? Author Donald L. Zygutis lays out a compelling case that points to a cover-up by the Pentagon and NASA, who may have buried it soon after it was written. How significant is the Stanford paper? The answer may lie in another question: How would a science-backed theory and search strategy to guide the discovery of alien artifacts among our own ancient civilizations impact the worldwide institutions of government, religion, and culture?

    ©2016 Donald L. Zygutis (P)2016 Tantor

    Autres livres audio du même :

    Ce que les auditeurs disent de The Sagan Conspiracy

    Notations

    Commentaires - Veuillez sélectionner les onglets ci-dessous pour changer la provenance des commentaires.

    Il n'y a pas encore de critique disponible pour ce titre.
    Trier par :
    Trier par:
    • Global
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      2 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Pat
    • Pat
    • 05/01/2018

    Laughable for a few reasons

    1. An actual quote from the narrator- “it makes sense if you don’t think about it.”

    2. If you feel the need to use cuss words as a narrating author, all you are achieving is the reducing creditability and intellect toward the topic.

    3. The content in its entirety could have been covered in one chapter. This was the most repetitive book I have checked out in a long time. Chapter 2 was a summary of chapter 1, and chapter 3 was a summary of chapter 2... etc.

    15 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      2 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Bryan Winchester
    • Bryan Winchester
    • 10/06/2017

    Conspiracy

    Repeats himself ALOT! Yes, equal and consistency science should be applied...

    Conspiracies are too easily postulated, cannot be proven nor disproven, and stimulate internal fears.

    Might work for Presidential elections... lol

    7 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      3 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      1 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Deborah F. Rose
    • Deborah F. Rose
    • 06/08/2020

    Long and boring

    I finished this book for only one reason so I can give it a one star. it’s very long on talk and very short on substance

    1 personne a trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      1 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Robert Kristoffersen
    • Robert Kristoffersen
    • 21/07/2018

    Very repetitive and not well substantiated

    What Donald Zygutis has written is less a book and more a rambling rant. He rails against Frank Drank and the Drake Equation seemingly on every other page. He also bolsters Carl Sagan as the one true Ancient Astronaut Theorist, even though there is little to support it. Don't waste your time on this book.

    3 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      1 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Polys Chrysouliotis
    • Polys Chrysouliotis
    • 30/12/2016

    Schizophrenic Behaviour

    What could have made this a 4 or 5-star listening experience for you?

    Not repeating the same things in 80 different ways.

    If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from The Sagan Conspiracy?

    Not repeating the same things in 80 different ways.

    8 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      4 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Utilisateur anonyme
    • Utilisateur anonyme
    • 07/06/2019

    Finally the truth Carl Sagan and ancient aliens.

    Finally the truth Carl Sagan , and the Stanford paper can be put in the proper perspective, he can be remembered for this ancient aliens, which NASA, the pentegon have tried to suppress.

    • Global
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      4 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Dave M
    • Dave M
    • 12/10/2017

    Quite Intriguing Especially if You Are a Sagan Fan

    So repetitive, but intriguing for sure. I'm going to contact the author for further discussions. Very good.

    2 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      3 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      3 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Jeff Carriere
    • Jeff Carriere
    • 04/08/2017

    interesting, good for a short book

    narration was good, and it's an interesting topic with valid points. the only downside is the amount of times the author repeats his disdain for NASA and Drake while praising Sagan.