Votre titre Audible gratuit

Calculating the Cosmos

How Mathematics Unveils the Universe
Lu par : Dana Hickox
Durée : 12 h et 39 min
4.5 out of 5 stars (2 notations)
Prix : 23,49 €
9,95 € / mois après 30 jours. Résiliable à tout moment.

Description

In Calculating the Cosmos, Ian Stewart presents an exhilarating guide to the cosmos, from our solar system to the entire universe. He describes the architecture of space and time, dark matter and dark energy, how galaxies form, why stars implode, how everything began, and how it's all going to end. He considers parallel universes, the fine-tuning of the cosmos for life, what forms extraterrestrial life might take, and the likelihood of life on Earth being snuffed out by an asteroid.

Beginning with the Babylonian integration of mathematics into the study of astronomy and cosmology, Stewart traces the evolution of our understanding of the cosmos: How Kepler's laws of planetary motion led Newton to formulate his theory of gravity. How, two centuries later, tiny irregularities in the motion of Mars inspired Einstein to devise his general theory of relativity. How, 80 years ago, the discovery that the universe is expanding led to the development of the Big Bang theory of its origins. How single-point origin and expansion led cosmologists to theorize new components of the universe, such as inflation, dark matter, and dark energy. But does inflation explain the structure of today's universe? Does dark matter actually exist? Could a scientific revolution that will challenge the long-held scientific orthodoxy and once again transform our understanding of the universe be on the way? In an exciting and engaging style, Calculating the Cosmos is a mathematical quest through the intricate realms of astronomy and cosmology.

PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying reference material will be available in your Library section along with the audio.

©2016 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (P)2016 Gildan Media LLC

Ce que les membres d'Audible en pensent

Notations

Global

  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 étoiles
    1
  • 4 étoiles
    1
  • 3 étoiles
    0
  • 2 étoiles
    0
  • 1 étoile
    0

Performance

  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 étoiles
    0
  • 4 étoiles
    1
  • 3 étoiles
    0
  • 2 étoiles
    0
  • 1 étoile
    0

Histoire

  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 étoiles
    0
  • 4 étoiles
    1
  • 3 étoiles
    0
  • 2 étoiles
    0
  • 1 étoile
    0
Il n'y a pas encore de critique disponible pour ce titre.
Trier par :
  • Global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars
  • R. Yu
  • 18/12/2016

The Narrator's Dilemma

Very well written book. Where others merely skim the surface, this one provides the details, necessary equations and delves into the discussions. That said, listening is ruined by the narrator's random guesswork (redundant, eh?) at pronouncing certain names, terms, and even common everyday language. Very annoying, distracting and, at times, misleading. Otherwise, his voice and pacing would have made him an effective choice.

8 sur 8 personne(s) ont trouvé cet avis utile.

  • Global
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Geb Blum
  • 17/04/2017

Horrible narrator

Mispronounced even the most simple words. Hard to concentrate on the book with the absolutely butchered narration.

4 sur 4 personne(s) ont trouvé cet avis utile.

  • Global
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Maxine
  • 01/06/2017

Somewhat annoying narration, but great book.

As mentioned in previous comments, the narrator's mispronunciations were pervasive and irritating. Although that regularly aggravated my OCD, I found the content of the book was entirely worth it, and often helped me ignore it.

As to the content itself, I was utterly astonished at the amount of astronomical evidence the author gave against currently accepted theories ranging from dark energy and dark matter to the expansion of the universe! I must note, however, that although I am personally still on the fence regarding multiverse theories, I found his refutations of these ideas lacking. For the interested listener, I highly suggest "The Mathematical Universe" by Max Tegmark which gives a clearer explanation of quantum decoherence and how it actually supports the Everretian multiverse as opposed to Mr. Stewart's misinterpretation. Overall, though, I do highly recommend this book, as I haven't seen most of his assertions in anything else I've read.

5 sur 6 personne(s) ont trouvé cet avis utile.

  • Global
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    2 out of 5 stars
  • James
  • 20/03/2017

Crank alert: rejects modern cosmology

Any additional comments?

The first half of the book is a nice survey of our solar system, it's formation, and discovery.

The second half goes off the deep end with bizarre dark matter denial, and crank alternatives to the Big Bang. He also gives a totally incorrect description of Schrodinger's cat.

The author seems to see himself as an outsider as a Mathematician. He constantly attacks a straw man of the physics community. He says things like, "nobody thinks about the boundary conditions" (which is simply false) and "there's also a tenancy to overstate the implications of the latest idea or discovery" (which is true about the media, but not about the scientific community).

This book is a good example of Max Planck's maxim "Science progresses one funeral at a time." This author just can't seem to accept scientific discoveries made after ~1950.

10 sur 13 personne(s) ont trouvé cet avis utile.

  • Global
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Anonymous in Silicon Valley
  • 03/12/2017

needs a physicist to read

The problem with this book is that the reader who has a very nice voice knows absolutely nothing about physics and probably is not very well educated at all in particular common mistakes are made that significantly detract from the usability of the book for a general reader and are absolutely grating to someone with a physics education for example the use of the word casual where the correct word is causal is absolutely catastrophic there are any number of other mispronunciations and common mis readings of words where for example inflaton field is read as inflation field that significantly work against a reader who would like to follow up on the material or learn more on the topics the book itself seems to be excellent I think the author did an excellent job however the audio book cannot be called excellent it is at best mediocre and at worst terrible

1 sur 1 personne(s) ont trouvé cet avis utile.

  • Global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Toby
  • 03/09/2017

Needs to be re-narrated

Someone who can pronounce the words used in this book should re-record it... Awful, awful mispronunciations abound!! Don’t buy this audio book.... Read the book—that would be my best recommendation !!

1 sur 1 personne(s) ont trouvé cet avis utile.

  • Global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Great and powerful IDE
  • 16/05/2017

good read/listen for someone interested in Cosmos

loved it broke down the cosmos into very easy to understand and manageable numbers to give a good perspective of topics covered in book.

1 sur 1 personne(s) ont trouvé cet avis utile.

  • Global
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Greg Schmidt
  • 13/12/2016

Fine book, mrs malaprop for a reader

What did you like best about this story?

Lots of new information about the cosmos, including a terrific discussion of the growing doubts about the Big Bang and mutliverses. Many twists on gravity and the arrangement of the various different kinds of bodies in the Universe that were new to me and very intriguing, e.g., LaGrange points and the asteroid belt.

Who would you have cast as narrator instead of Dana Hickox?

Dana Hickox is fine but for a raft of mangled pronunciations. Principia, Charon, Copernicus, Bethe, LaPlace, Magellanic and many others - OK names can be tricky - but boson, parabola, hyperbola, spontaneity, radii, chirality and, for God's sake, analogous. Hickox needs to slow down and look up pronunciations and stop taking flying leaps. He is actually a very good reader but blows it by being lazy on the look ups.

1 sur 1 personne(s) ont trouvé cet avis utile.

  • Global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Hendrick Mcdonald
  • 11/01/2017

Oddly Underwhelming for Stewart

I think I expected something more akin to The Science of Interstellar, but it was less that and more a history of discoveries in our solar system, with the last third on the wider universe. Found it generally underwhelming, with little more to say than "math is very exact and where there are questions in the data scientists have made discoveries." Meh.

2 sur 3 personne(s) ont trouvé cet avis utile.

  • Global
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Gregory V. Bard
  • 15/11/2018

Very poor recording of a great author

The narration and recording are very poor. The audio makes frequent references to diagrams/images which are unavailable to a listener! Therefore, I would recommend the printed version. Even then, take note: the first 20% to 25% is all common knowledge to any STEM undergraduate. It gets a heck of a lot better, later.

Trier par :
  • Global
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Dr. Andreas J. Häusler
  • 24/10/2018

Meagerly executed audio

Ian Stewart’s book is written well enough for a popular science essay on astronomy, but I might have enjoyed it much more if the narration would have been carried out in a more enthusiastic fashion. As it goes, Dana Hickox overly inflects almost every sentence’s last words, making the narration a very tiresome listening experience. Also, his pronunciation often is a hindrance in following the course of the book if one didn’t have a rudimentary understanding of astronomy to begin with. For instance, he makes “ecliptic” sound like “elliptic”, what he replaces Newton’s “Principia Mathematica” with is barely recognizable as such, and when he reads out titles of publications other than in English, it’s entirely unintelligible gibberish. Here, some training would be valuable, so as to achieve the high standard set, for instance, by Ray Porter, whose narration of both fiction and science books is outstanding. It’s a pity, really, since the book itself appears to be well written and sound.