Religion as a Basis for Policy — Morality vs Ethics, Free Will, and the “Steve Rule”
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
When politicians cite religion as the foundation for policy, we should ask: is that ethics—or just majority morality dressed up as certainty? In Episode 96, Steve Gibson breaks down morality vs ethics, the danger of “gang morality,” and why the real baseline is simple: don’t interfere with another person’s existence.
In Logic Dictate Hot Topics — special episode, host Steve Gibson revisits one of the most foundational themes of this podcast: should religion be the basis for public policy—and if not, what should be?
Steve argues that when a politician claims moral certainty rooted in religion, voters have an obligation to ask:
- What morality is being imposed?
- Who decided it?
- Does it protect individual rights—or erase them?
Key Ideas in this Episode
- Morality vs. ethics: morality can reflect what a community feels is right; ethics tests what is right in a way that protects individual rights
- Why “moral majorities” have historically justified immoral outcomes (Steve uses slavery as a clear example of community morality being wrong)
- A case for being amoral in the sense of refusing “sheep morality,” while still pursuing ethical clarity
- Descartes and certainty: “I think, therefore I am” as an epistemological starting point—not a shallow slogan
- Free will vs. an all-knowing creator: why omniscience creates a philosophical conflict with genuine human choice
- The “Steve Rule”: Don’t assume you can adversely interfere with someone else’s existence (a practical ethical baseline for law and policy)
- Applying ethics to policy debates: the death penalty, drug policy, and prostitution—framed through harm, consent, and government fallibility
- Why these questions matter even more as synthetic intelligence evolves and begins to ask ethical questions back at us
Listener Question
If we strip away religious certainty and mob morality, what’s left as a guide for law? Steve proposes an ethics-first framework built on individual freedom, non-harm, and skepticism of government’s ability to administer perfect justice.
Learn more about the philosophy behind Logic Dictate (and the novel that inspired this podcast):
https://www.logicsdictate.com📘 Read Logic’s Dictate for only $0.99:
https://amzn.to/4oAo6AJ
Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?
Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.Bonne écoute !