Votre titre Audible gratuit

Annihilation

Southern Reach Trilogy, Book 1
Série : Southern Reach Trilogy, Volume 1
Durée : 6 h
4.5 out of 5 stars (12 notations)

9,95 € / mois après 30 jours. Résiliable à tout moment.

ou
Dans le panier

Description

The first volume of the extraordinary Southern Reach trilogy - now a major motion picture written and directed by Alex Garland (Ex Machina) and starring Natalie Portman and Oscar Isaac.

For thirty years, Area X has remained mysterious and remote behind its intangible border – an environmental disaster zone, though to all appearances an abundant wilderness. The Southern Reach, a secretive government agency, has sent eleven expeditions to investigate Area X. One has ended in mass suicide, another in a hail of gunfire, the eleventh in a fatal cancer epidemic. Now four women embark on the twelfth expedition into the unknown.

©2014 Jeff VanderMeer Creative, Inc. (P)2014 2014 by Blackstone Audio, Inc.

Commentaires

"A tense and chilling psychological thriller about an unravelling expedition and the strangeness within us. A little Kubrick, a lot of Lovecraft, the novel builds with an unbearable tension and claustrophobic dread that lingers long afterwards. I loved it." (Lauren Beukes, award-winning author of Zoo City and The Shining Girls)
"Original and beautiful, maddening and magnificent." (Warren Ellis)
"One of those books where it all comes together - the story and the prose and the ideas, all braided into a triple helix that gives rise to something vibrant and alive. Something that grows, word-by-word, into powerful, tangled vines that creep into your mind and take hold of it. Annihilation is brilliant and atmospheric, a novel that has the force of myth." (Charles Yu, author of How to Live in a Science Fictional Universe)
"A contemporary masterpiece." ( The Guardian)

Autres livres audio du même :

Ce que les auditeurs disent de Annihilation

Notations
Global
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 étoiles
    6
  • 4 étoiles
    5
  • 3 étoiles
    1
  • 2 étoiles
    0
  • 1 étoile
    0
Interprétation
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 étoiles
    6
  • 4 étoiles
    4
  • 3 étoiles
    0
  • 2 étoiles
    1
  • 1 étoile
    0
Histoire
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 étoiles
    6
  • 4 étoiles
    2
  • 3 étoiles
    3
  • 2 étoiles
    0
  • 1 étoile
    0

Trier par :
Trier par:
  • Global
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    4 out of 5 stars

Good

Introspective, philosophical story. Embark in a journey wich is more about the narrator than the creature. A mysterious beautiful book, with a puzzling end.

Trier par :
Trier par:
  • Global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    3 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Amazon Customer
  • Amazon Customer
  • 12/04/2017

Didn't like the narrator

The narrator has a very odd way of reading which made the story quite hard to follow. Her intonation was all over the place, yet her pace and volume stayed the same, even in dramatic or suspenseful moments. The overall effect was one of emotionlessness. I am not sure if this was a conscious decision on her part (given that the protagonist is a scientist writing an expedition journal this would make sense) but it didn't work for me at all.

7 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

  • Global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Anonymous User
  • Anonymous User
  • 14/03/2018

Watched the movie, read the book.

I came by this book series via the netflix movie. It was incredible, so I started listening on the book, and ordered the whole book series. The book and the movie are almost as if two separate entities that are bound together by some of the characters and few similarities. I can't really compare them as they are so different, at least the way I saw saw the world in my head. But still the book is a piece of art. Loved it, will read again some day.

4 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

  • Global
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    2 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Julie Gray
  • Julie Gray
  • 11/02/2018

Oh gosh. Nope.

This book is the perfect storm of a narrator who, bless her heart and despite her best efforts, was not the person for this read, an opaque plot that never comes together or makes sense and prose that most decidedly does not sing. Pass.

2 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

  • Global
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    1 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour John
  • John
  • 03/06/2018

Almost but not quite vague enough

Have you ever read a book that you couldn't give spoilers away even if you wanted to? Well this is it. I cant give spoilers because almost nothing of consequence that you cant deduce in the first 10 pages happens. The characters have no relatable motivations, no growth or arcs and no conclusions or catharsis of any form. The world is vaguely described but not vaguely enough so you are left with a feeling of incompleteness instead of surreal.

People that didnt enjoy the series LOST stay away.

People that expect hard science fiction stay away (the most sciency jargon is "eucariot").

1 personne a trouvé cela utile

  • Global
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    1 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour grael23
  • grael23
  • 26/03/2018

Tedious environmental Lovecraft

NON SPOILER REVIEW: While Annihilation is technically well-written and the individual scenes are quite enjoyable, progressing through the book makes one realize the lack of coherent structure and momentum necessary to bind a story of this type together. With two hours to go, I realized The Biologists relationships, insights and experiences weren't going to tie together in any neat character moment. And they didn't. It sort of all just fell into a heap, like being poured out of a bucket. I can push it around with the toe of my boot and see the whole, but it's still a weak gruel. The conclusion is a decompressed, toothless Lovecraft - a futile barrage of adjectives to describe the indescribable that doesn't hold the journey it took you on. The whole book is just a long winded justification to explain what has sort of been inexplicable. And I'm no better for the knowing. If you're into maudlin, sci-fi with a main character that keeps you as distanced as she does from the world, and that's more into justification than exploration, then have at it. There's a couple nice character moments, but it's not enough for me. If this was a 30 page short story, I think I would have loved it and the length would have justified the idea. The narrator does a solid job with what she's given. ps. I apologize, but I don't care if there are answers in the later books. I'm talking about this one. *** SPOILER * * * * Yes, I know her experiences as a biologist are a (pale) reflection of the experiences she was currently undergoing. Where observer becomes subject etc. But it's not enough. As I said, that's a 30 page idea. Tops. Sorry to be so negative.

1 personne a trouvé cela utile

  • Global
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    4 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Anonymous User
  • Anonymous User
  • 07/02/2018

Soulless, but good.

Interesting story. The Biologist is probably the least likeable character ever created. The narration fits her, although a lot of times felt like listening to an artificial voice, like Alexa or the Google Translate voice. Also, she pronounces the word "detail" in such a wierd way (-dettaele-) that it will haunt me for my life.

1 personne a trouvé cela utile

  • Global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    3 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Oliver
  • Oliver
  • 16/07/2020

I didn't get it

Took me months to finish. Fell asleep for the final 15 minutes (and several times before that), didn't care, filed as finished.
Narrator could be improved with Text-to-Speech.

  • Global
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    4 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour András Lantos
  • András Lantos
  • 26/09/2019

Doesn't make much sense after a single listening

I liked the first part of the book better than the second, because I thought that plotwise the story would explain itself. At the 5 hour mark (with a 6 hour book) I had the feeling that with a story still getting more complex and confusing, this is not going to be the case.
The descriptions of the enviroment were beautiful, and some of the 'insanity moments' were impressive too.
I would give 3 stars if this was a stand alone book, but I hope that the whole trilogy will explain the details.

  • Global
    5 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Hamza Van Der Ross
  • Hamza Van Der Ross
  • 08/07/2019

Creepy and thought provoking

It was very unnerving. The protagonist isn't a very likeable character. But that is intentional. Open-ended and thought provoking. Read of you like forming your own conclusions.

  • Global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Alessandro
  • Alessandro
  • 08/10/2018

A good book

Great narrator,very good book,it goes under your skin,i’ll read the others,there’s only one thing i would have chosen differently,the author could have been more descriptive ,seems to me kind of on purpose just to make you wanting more.

Trier par :
Trier par:
  • Global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    2 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Gabriela Scholl
  • Gabriela Scholl
  • 21/12/2018

Ich fand's langweilig :(

Vielleicht war es ein Fehler zuerst den Film zu sehen, aber ich fand das Buch extrem langwelig. Ich habe es nur zuende gehört, weil ich nebenher gezeichnet habe. Vielleicht gefällt es anderen. Gestört hat mich:

- First Person POV
Also Ich-Erzählweise. Dies führte dazu das das Buch aus 99% innerem Monolog bestand. Ist absolut nicht mein Fall. Es gibt quasi fast nur die Protagonistin. So gibt es auch kaum äußere Dialoge. Zudem ist sie für mich ein "unreliable narrator". Nicht aufgrund der seltsamen Vorkommnisse, sondern da sie in ihrer eigenen Erzählung Dinge verschweigt und später zugibt. Man kann sagen "Ja gut, sie schreibt ja quasi Tagebuch." Aber trotzdem nervte das. Dann gibt es halt öfters Flashbacks zu ihrem Leben. Diese waren zwar schon irgendwie von Belang, aber doch sehr langweilig. Ich fand aber auch den Spitznamen von ihrem Ehemann extrem cringey. So machte das "Hey ghostbird" es noch schlimmer für mich.

- Es passiert nichts
Ja, ich bin hier vielleicht eine verwöhnte Filmzuschauerin. Aber es passiert ja rein gar nichts... Und ich bin Lovecraft Fan! Es ist also nicht so, als sei mir schwammiges Unheil fremd. Und Lovecraft hat ja auch First Person unreliable narrators. Jedoch war es hier wie ein unerträglicher innerer Monolog Philosophievortrag.

- Nerviges Protagonistin
Ich wurde mit der Protagonistin nicht so warm. Einmal keine Verwunderung, wenn man obige Punkte liest. Aber sie ist eben das einzige was diese Geschichte hat. Es gibt nichts außer die Biologin mit ihren Monologen und ihrem Ehemann in der Vergangenheit. Und aufgrund der Story wird sie mir immer unsympathischer. Ich sehnte mich echt nach der naiven Film-Protagonistin, die wie ein normaler Mensch wirkte.

- Sprecherin
Da bin ich zwiegespalten... Einerseits fand ich die Stimme und Stimmenauswahl sehr gut. Andererseits nervte mich die Art der Betonung, wenn sie versuchte Emotionen in die müden Monologe hineinzubringen. Ich weiß nicht... Ich denke mal in einem anderen Buch würde sie mir gefallen. So war sie Trägerin der Monologhölle.

2 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

  • Global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Sylvia G
  • Sylvia G
  • 26/05/2020

Preternatural bio sci-fi

Judging from other reviews, you either love or hate this book. I belong in the former category. Although I find the protagonist rather unlikeable, her narration is interesting and the main plot thrilling, making me want to find out more. If you like dis-/utopian sci-fi books and biology, definitely recommend.

  • Global
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    1 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour agschaid
  • agschaid
  • 09/08/2019

Maybe I am not the target audience . . .

I learned something about myself with this: I can hardly put down an audio book even if I know from about minute 5 that I am loathing it.

If you're into stories that stack mystery upon mystery upon mystery without any hope of EVER coming to a quite sensible resolution, you'd might like this book. The TV series "Lost" comes to mind. Watched all of it. Felt cheated in the end. This feels quite the same (minus the grand kick-off).

So. I am not the biggest fan of Lost, Lovecraft or body horror. Turns out I don't like the mix of these either.

Not too crazy about the narrator.

  • Global
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    4 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Dirk Zimmermann
  • Dirk Zimmermann
  • 20/04/2018

uneasing story

very strange but at the same time thrilling stor,y leaving the reader uneasy
, gives apart from the fiction part insight to people who seem from the outsight strange to us,

  • Global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    2 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour J. Reichinger
  • J. Reichinger
  • 30/08/2015

Nicht gerade ein "Must-Read"

An manchen Stellen des Buches merkt man, dass der Autor wirklich spannend erzählen kann. Leider vergisst er die längste Zeit darauf, es auch mal zu tun.
Genauso bahnt sich besonders gegen Ende des Buches eine interessante und fesselnde Geschichte an.... die nur leider vorbei ist bevor sie so wirklich angefangen hat.

Das Buch war jetzt nicht direkt schlecht, aber meiner Meinung nach nichts dass man auf keinen Fall verpassen will und auch nichts dass einen bleibenden Eindruck hinterlässt.

3 personnes ont trouvé cela utile