orchestration chart shadow Ai and cost per outcome - debate
Unable to add items
Sorry, we're unable to add the item because your cart is already full.
Add to basket failed.
Please try again later
Add to wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Failed to remove from Wish List.
Please try again later
Adding to library failed
Please try again
Unable to follow podcast
Unable to unfollow podcast
orchestration chart shadow Ai and cost per outcome - debate
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
> 80% of employees report individual productivity gains from AI, yet only 37% of enterprise leaders see a positive EBIT impact[1][2]. Why is there such a massive gap between personal task speed and institutional profit[1]?
> In this GFE Weekly Insights deep dive and debate, we dissect why task automation is hitting a wall—and why the next competitive advantage lies in decision architecture[1][3].
> In this episode, we debate:
- Tasks vs. Decisions: Why automating document creation or proposals just accelerates existing bureaucracy unless you redesign decision rights and guardrails[4][5].
- Org Charts vs. Orchestration Charts: How moving from departmental silos to cross-functional outcome mapping removes unnecessary context transfers[6][7].
- Cost-per-Head vs. Cost-per-Outcome: Why human-agent workforce economics break traditional seat-based budgeting[8][9].
- Shadow AI as Unofficial Process Research: Why unauthorized AI usage reveals the exact operational friction points your official workflows ignore[10][11].
> This is the weekly insights of Growth Flow Engineering curated and orchestrated by Moses Sam Paul Johnraj - Partner at GrowthFlowEngineering.xyz
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet