In Part 2 of the

The episode compares median household income and FHFA house-price growth in Pinellas County, Florida, and Knox County, Tennessee, from 1995 to 2024. In both counties, household income increased substantially, but housing prices increased faster.

The discussion then expands into inflation, deflation, and downward nominal wage rigidity to show why rising wages, falling prices, or any other single economic number cannot explain household conditions by itself.

The central question is simple:

It is not only how much money you make. What can that income actually buy?

This episode does not present the housing comparison as a complete affordability model or claim that housing represents all purchasing power. Instead, it isolates one relationship to examine how income and prices can move at different rates.

Next episode:

In the first episode of this five-part series on economic participation, Orlando J. Alvarez examines a basic distinction that is easy to overlook: income is not wealth.

Income tells us how much money is flowing into a household. Wealth considers what we own and what we owe. Purchasing power asks a different question altogether: what can that income actually buy?

Using income-tier data, household examples, and lived experience from more than two decades in the workforce, Orlando asks whether occupying a similar place in the income distribution today necessarily provides the same economic capacity it did decades ago.

This episode establishes four concepts that will guide the rest of the series: income, purchasing power, assets, and wealth.

The objective is not to argue against wealth or prescribe an economic policy. It is to understand the relationships before reaching conclusions about them.

Next episode: