What experience and foundational clinical knowledge do you need before taking on forensic cases? How can you turn complex, sometimes conflicting evidence into a clear and defensible forensic narrative? What essential skills distinguish a competent forensic psychologist from a true expert?

In this podcast episode, Dr. Casey Mangnall speaks with Dr. Kirk Heilbrun about developing expertise in forensic psychology and the training required to become a competent forensic expert. They explore the importance of gaining foundational clinical experience, mastering essential assessment and interviewing skills, and producing clear, defensible forensic reports. Dr. Heilbrun also discusses how to synthesise complex and sometimes conflicting evidence into a cohesive narrative, as well as the future of forensic psychology, including cultural competence, advances in research, and the responsible use of AI.

What are the business basics you should have in place before taking on forensic cases? What does marketing yourself as a forensic psychologist look like? Which aspects are essential to have in place before taking your first forensic case?

In this episode, Dr. Casey Mangnall discusses the business foundations psychologists need to establish before taking on forensic cases. She explores how to market yourself as a forensic psychologist, build relationships with attorneys, and put the right systems in place to manage cases effectively.

How can you shift your mindset from defending your opinions to explaining your reasoning? How should you prepare for cross-examination before stepping into the courtroom? What strategies can help you answer difficult questions confidently?

In this episode, I share practical strategies for making courtroom testimony less intimidating for forensic psychologists. I explain how shifting from defending my opinions to explaining my reasoning can help me approach difficult questions with greater confidence. I discuss the importance of considering alternative hypotheses, acknowledging limitations, and preparing for cross-examination before entering the courtroom. I also share techniques for answering challenging questions, including slowing down, asking for clarification, sticking to the question, and recognising when I don't know the answer. Ultimately, I emphasise that my role is not to win or defend my ego, but to help the court understand the evidence and the reasoning behind my professional opinions.