Cover of Healthcare Scandal Investigations

Healthcare Scandal Investigations

Healthcare Scandal Investigations

By: Creator at Obomedia
Listen for free

Season's Savings | 0.99 €/month for 3 months

5.99 €/month thereafter - terms apply. Cancel monthly.
Summary
 Uncover the forgotten stories, groundbreaking discoveries, and bizarre practices that shaped modern medicine. Medical History Files brings to life the extraordinary tales from the annals of healthcare, revealing how our understanding of the human body and disease has evolved through centuries of trial and error.

From ancient cures and medieval plagues to the birth of modern surgery and the fight against epidemics, we explore the unsung heroes, controversial figures, and pivotal moments in medical history. Each episode delves into meticulously researched accounts, offering a fresh perspective on the challenges and triumphs that define the healing arts.

New investigations into these fascinating medical narratives are published daily, Monday through Sunday, at 9:00 AM. Expect compelling storytelling that transforms complex historical facts into engaging and accessible insights, perfect for your daily dose of historical knowledge.

This podcast is for anyone curious about the origins of medical practices, the evolution of health sciences, or simply loves a well-told story from the past. If you've ever wondered about the "why" and "how" behind today's healthcare, Medical History Files is your indispensable guide.

Subscribe now and start your journey through the captivating world of medical history.© 2026 OBOMEDIA Creators
Episodes
  • How a Doctor's Syringe Silenced a King - The 1936 Secret

    How a Doctor's Syringe Silenced a King - The 1936 Secret
    29 Oct 2026
    How a Doctor's Syringe Silenced a King - The 1936 Secret

    A private diary reveals that on January 20, 1936 a physician injected morphine and cocaine into King George V’s jugular vein two and a half hours after a public bulletin announced he was “sinking.” Why did Lord Dawson choose a direct jugular injection and time the death so the morning papers, and what does that choice tell us about duty, mercy and image in 1930s Britain?

    In this episode, we trace the events at Sandringham House on the night George V died, following the timeline from the dinner menu bulletin to the diary entry that named the drugs and the route of injection; how did a single decision by the king’s doctor shape a national moment?

    Person: George V
    Person: Lord Dawson of Penn (Bertrand Dawson)
    Date: January 20, 1936
    Location: Sandringham House, Norfolk
    Event: Doctor’s diary records morphine and cocaine injected into the jugular; death announced earlier by bulletin

    - The bulletin announcing the king was “sinking” was written on the back of a dinner menu card and released at roughly 9:25 PM.
    - George V was still alive when the bulletin went out and died at 11:55 PM, two and a half hours later.
    - Lord Dawson recorded in his private diary that he injected morphine and cocaine directly into the king’s jugular vein.
    - George V was 70 years old and had been using oxygen tanks permanently by 1935 due to chronic bronchitis from decades of heavy smoking.
    - Dawson’s diary gave two reasons for the injection: to spare the king a prolonged “mechanical end” and to ensure the death was reported in the morning broadsheets rather than the evening journals.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Show more Show less
    18 min
  • He Heard Their Plot: Awake, Anesthesia Awareness and Betrayal

    He Heard Their Plot: Awake, Anesthesia Awareness and Betrayal
    28 Oct 2026
    He Heard Their Plot: Awake, Anesthesia Awareness and Betrayal

    A young man straps to an operating table, chest open, and hears the men plotting his death while unable to move-a clinical nightmare tied to the real phenomenon of anesthesia awareness and a disputed incidence rate that still divides doctors and patients. How did a thriller about a conscious patient thrust anesthesia awareness into public debate, and what does the gap between medical statistics and survivor testimony mean for trust in surgery?

    In this episode, we tell the story presented in the film Awake and the medical controversy it popularized, tracing the characters, the scheme surrounding a heart transplant, and the unanswered question about how often anesthesia awareness truly occurs.

    Person: Clay Beresford Jr
    Person: Lilith Beresford
    Person: Dr. Jack Harper
    Person: Samantha Lockwood
    Topic: Anesthesia awareness

    - Clay Beresford Jr is twenty-two years old and failing from heart disease.
    - Four malpractice suits are pending against Dr. Jack Harper.
    - Samantha Lockwood's six-month engagement and midnight wedding were engineered before the surgery.
    - The donor heart had been injected with Adriamycin to cause the transplanted organ to fail.
    - The Ontario Society of Anesthesiologists estimated awareness at roughly one in a thousand.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Show more Show less
    19 min
  • When 300,000 Units Met Meningitis: Who Stole Andrew's Hearing?

    When 300,000 Units Met Meningitis: Who Stole Andrew's Hearing?
    27 Oct 2026
    When 300,000 Units Met Meningitis: Who Stole Andrew's Hearing?

    The moment a syringe held 300,000 units instead of the prescribed 10,000, a child’s life changed: within hours Andrew convulsed and developed hemiparesis, and by discharge on 24 December 1986 he was profoundly deaf in both ears. How could an admitted thirty-fold overdose and a confirmed case of pneumococcal meningitis both be true causes yet the law refuse to link them?

    In this episode, we walk through the clinical timeline, the uncontested negligence, the laboratory confirmation of pneumococcal meningitis, and the legal struggle that followed to decide whether the overdose or the disease stole Andrew’s hearing - which question did the courts ultimately leave unanswered?

    Person: Andrew
    Date (overdose): 29 November 1986
    Date (discharge): 24 December 1986
    Diagnosis: Pneumococcal meningitis (confirmed by two separate cultures)
    Dose administered: 300,000 units intrathecal penicillin (prescribed dose 10,000 units)

    - The prescribed intrathecal penicillin dose was 10,000 units but the syringe contained 300,000 units.
    - Two separate cerebrospinal fluid cultures confirmed Streptococcus pneumoniae as the cause of meningitis.
    - Within hours of the injection, Andrew experienced convulsions and hemiparesis consistent with intrathecal penicillin toxicity.
    - Andrew was discharged on 24 December 1986 and was found to be profoundly and permanently deaf in both ears.
    - The Ayrshire and Arran Health Board admitted the overdose; the courts nonetheless declined to legally connect the overdose to Andrew’s deafness.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Show more Show less
    18 min
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet