Ep 3 | What Do We Actually Mean by Scientific Evidence?
Unable to add items
Sorry, we're unable to add the item because your cart is already full.
Add to basket failed.
Please try again later
Add to wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Failed to remove from Wish List.
Please try again later
Adding to library failed
Please try again
Unable to follow podcast
Unable to unfollow podcast
Ep 3 | What Do We Actually Mean by Scientific Evidence?
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
What does it actually mean when someone says the Enneagram is “scientifically validated” - or, on the flip side, that there’s “no evidence” for it at all?
In this episode, we break down some of the basic building blocks of scientific evidence - observation, correlation, reliability, validity, replication, and predictive value - and apply them to common Enneagram claims.
You’ll also hear why:
- Evidence for one part of a theory doesn't validate the whole system
- Reliability and validity are not the same thing
- Correlation does not automatically prove an Enneagram explanation
- “Supported,” “Plausible,” and “Speculative” are useful ways to think about different claims
- One study may be interesting, but it is not scientific consensus
The goal isn't to prove or disprove the Enneagram as a whole, but to ask a better question:
Which claims have earned which level of confidence?
Find more at @scientificenneagram on Instagram.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet