Good story - Narrator tries hard to kill it...

Any additional comments?

This is a very good Clancy story. Lots of intriguing inside baseball detail about the inner workings of the CIA. However, the narration made it almost unlistenable. It sounds like every sentence in the book - no, every phrase - was recorded seperately and spliced together. It is so disjointed and emotionless that it took me the entire first part to get used to it. It is comically bad, especially when compared to the Clancy stuff done by Lou Diamond Phillps. I don't regret buying it because it is a good story, but it is painful to listen to...Buyer beware...

30 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Good Clancy Book and Enjoyable Audio

Would you consider the audio edition of The Bear and the Dragon to be better than the print version?

No, just more convenient.

Did the plot keep you on the edge of your seat? How?

Yes, though I feel

What does Michael Prichard bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

Since he reads slower than others (an advantage to me !): better focus on the story.

Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

There are humorous moments and even a sense of irony !

Any additional comments?

I find Tom Clancy espionage and political stories enjoyable, though I feel more inclined towards Robert Littell, Frederick Forsyth, and John le Carre.
Contrary to several opinions expressed here, I find Michael Pritchard read good. Others, like Scott Brick may read faster and, perhaps, involve themselves more into the story, but I personally am satisfied with Michael's narration. There is enough voice modulation and intonation to provide for an enjoyable listening experience. Pronouncing foreign (non-English) names (different accent !) is not often easy for English readers, but Michael's effort is commendable.

13 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Michael Pritchard=Monotone

Michael Pritchard has the wrong voice for audiobooks, looking forward to Lou Diamond Philips in Dead or Alive.

15 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Save your money until they re-do with new narrator

I have been listening to audio books, in one medium or another, since 1990, and I can say that this narrator should retire.

I seen other reviews for other books where people have said the narrator was horrible. But I still got the book because I liked the author. But although the narrator was bad, I was able to muddle through.

But Michael Prichard is 10 times worse. I'm not trying to be mean, but it's like he doesn't even care. He just reads the words so he can get his paycheck.

If you don't believe me or think I'm just being cruel, just look at the reviews for some of the other Clancy books that Prichard does. I'm not the only one that finds Prichard unbearable.

And to the publisher, if you are wondering why repeat sales of the Clancy books are so low, this is why. Please find a new narrator to redo the Clancy books. I love Clancy, but I'm not sitting through another book read by Prichard.

30 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Ever a Clancy Fan

As is evidenced by my other reviews, I'm hardly a book critic or a literary connoisseur, but I sure do love me some Jack Ryan. The plot arc that starts in Sum of Fears finds ends well in The Bear and the Dragon.

It appears that several of these Jack Ryan books are available in duplicate versions, ones read by Scott Brick and one by Michael Pritchard. I enjoy both authors, but suggest that as much as you can, stick to one narrator or the other; it does greatly help with the flow.

9 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

1/4 of the way and couldn't keep going

I had enjoyed the Jack Ryan series through to this book. Executive orders was a bit on the long end, but with a dramatic premise that was engaging. See good reads for pretty accurate more detailed reviews of the plot .

1/4 of the way through the book and the plot continues at glacial pace due to unneeded narratives. Rather than the characters having their own political and personal views drive the plot and their development, the characters seem to repetitively mouth piece the author's political views with no particular character development/story plot purpose. I enjoy Michael Prichard's other readings, but the combination of repetitive political narratives (and enough 'I hate this job' Jack Ryan jibes that get old over two books), unnecessarily crude language, slow plot, and the narrator's performance made for one of few audio books I was unable to finish.

2 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Bored Had To Skip Ahead

What disappointed you about The Bear and the Dragon?

Way too much detail, stories fell into the ditch. Ending was great, no idea what's in the middle and don't care. Very disappointed with Tom or whoever wrote this book. I even speeded the playback up to 1.5 but still boring.

What was your reaction to the ending? (No spoilers please!)

Sure happy the right team won.

What does Michael Prichard bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

He did good!

What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?

Disappointment

1 personne a trouvé cela utile

Clancy's Worst So Far

I've been reading Clancy's books for many years, and I always look forward to the next John Ryan book in the series. This one was a big disappointment, for a few major reasons:

1.) Weak Plot: most Clancy novels are chess games, with a good portion of the book devoted to maneuvering pieces into place, then pitting them against each other in a big battle at the end (but with lots of technical details and some character work thrown in for good measure). This one felt like a LOT of maneuvering with a relatively boring payoff in the end.

2.) Too Preachy: the author's conservative biases (which have always been a part of his books) came through quite a bit louder in this novel than I've noticed in others. I heard notes of homophobia, pro-life ranting, and racism. In the past, I've chalked these up to the prejudices of each character (which are unavoidable, of course) but this time it felt like the author's own biases coming through... it was honestly uncomfortable enough that I'm not sure if I'll read another of his books.

3.) Mediocre Narration: I wouldn't call him a "bad" narrator, but his voice often enhanced the boring-ness of the plot.

Overall, this one was a slog for me. I'm ready for my next listen to be something both exciting and engaging.

7 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

This is a great book

This story is about Russia, China, and the USA , human rights and the treatment of citizens...a whole lot of history, and predictions for the future.
The story highlights ... Greed, a country on the fringe of becoming economically stable, and unusuall alliances ... Something here for all readers...lots of emotional flares... And vulnerablity by strong people.
Worth a credit any day
Michael Prichard turns in a great job reading

1 personne a trouvé cela utile

The story just went on and on…

If you could sum up The Bear and the Dragon in three words, what would they be?

Exciting, (to a point); technology and government

What did you like best about this story?

Made the Russians look like they were human and made the Chinese look really, really stupid. In other words, we get to deploy our best toys against a completely outmatched army and demonized Chinese.

Describing combat prep and combat Clancy excelled.

Did the narration match the pace of the story?

No one could talk that slow.

Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?

No, WAY too long and obscure. I don't want to sit in a chair for nearly 4 days straight. I couldn't say awake long enough.

1 personne a trouvé cela utile